In my profession, there is the worry that spending my day watching and assessing porn will undermine my ability to enjoy it. That I will become less sensitive, less responsive. When I first arrived at SneakyUpskirt I experienced a moment of worry, wondering if the sense of déjà vu that swept over me was my nightmare become real.

What a relief ladies and gents, to discover that my taste for puss-puss had merely been overwhelmed by the nonexclusive content. I was simply looking at loads of pictures that I have seen on other sites in the same company network. This is an unrepentant reuse of material, even including page headers from the other locations.

I don't know which would have been worse, the recycling or if they'd tried to cover it up. Still, as I waded deeper the amount of recycled material became annoying and even more so when I discovered there are no videos included on this site.

I found 65 galleries and let's say, conservatively, one third redirected me to other sites. Moreover, there are five more than there was the last time around. Disappointing, yes, but not so surprising considering the way this company has set up its other sites.

Unfortunately, this was not the end of the site's failings. Quality on a photographs-only site needs to be worth writing about. Here I found only one high-res gallery set.

The overall effect emerges as cheap and at the expense of the membership-paying viewers. With a membership fee that is above that of many other porn sites, it claims that members are given free access to 22 other sites.

While feeds are a routine inclusion on many porn sites, the bonus sites offer quality no better than the main content and the sharing of material undermines the worth of some of those extra sites. Now prospective members, how difficult a decision is that?